Non-blogging the Cs

| | Comments (6)

That's what I'm doing, I guess. I do have the excuse of not actually being there. With the exception so far of Dennis and Alex, there are a lot of folk who don't share my excuse who are non-blogging it just as hard as I am.

That's a really backwards way, I suppose, of a little bemoaning on my part. I'm happy to update status and tweet, but if you don't believe that something's been lost in the grand migration to nanoblogging, well, I'd disagree. Not that CCCC was ever a hotbed of blogtastic simulcasting or anything, but the peak of that activity seems to have passed. In an age of increased networking and transparency, the conference seems content to slide back into pre-web levels of opacity. And by the conference, I mean us, of course. I hear tell that the wifi at this year's conference is dismal, which is certainly a contributing factor, but again, it's not as though it's something that we don't have control over. Or at least influence. Wifi should be considered a conference utility not unlike meeting spaces or electricity, and we should be holding our conference sites to pretty high standards.

Anyways. What actually prompted my post was Steve's link to Dan's presentation, and his ruminations on the conference in general:

what's the point of conferences nowadays? Sure, it's about networking, having meetings in person (always more efficient than meetings online, I will admit), getting "away" in the sense of a retreat, getting "away" in the sense of an opportunity to go out with friends, etc. It's fun. But now that it is possible- even pretty easy- to put a presentation like this up on the web, I'm not sure if the pros of a face to face meet-up outweigh the cons of conferences- the costs of registration/lodging/food, the time away from work/family/friends/home, the damage to the earth resulting from air travel, the bad eating/drinking habits, etc.

My answer to this is similarly ambivalent, seeing as how this is the 2nd year in a row that I've missed CCCC, and I can't really lay claim to missing it especially. It's always been one of those things for me that I enjoy when I'm there, but don't really like getting ready for, getting to, or recovering from.

That being said, I think one of the things that's important about CCCC is that it's the one time where we catch a glimpse of the true size of our network/discipline. It's only a glimpse, mind you, but still. As large and unwieldy as the conference is, our discipline is larger still, and it doesn't hurt to remind ourselves of that on an annual basis. I think we forget sometimes. Larger in terms of people, but also larger in terms of interests, perspectives, and philosophy.

But that being said, I think it fair to note that the conference has largely run afoul of the problems of scale. I think it's designed for a much smaller group, and I think our vision of it has not really kept pace with its growth. I've written on a few other occasions about how that's the case, so I won't go into details, but I do honestly believe that it's not a matter of tweaking. I'd love to see some overhauls and I'd love to see some conversations about the possibilities, but I'm not optimistic that either will ever occur. And I've written (and ranted to anyone who'll listen) about why I don't feel that optimism is warranted, and don't really feel like dredging up those args either.

I do think a national conference is worth it, but I'm not sure our national conference is worth it. But then, it's what we've got, and so I'm thinking now about Louisville, and wishing that a few more panel reviews find their way online in the next couple of days.

That's all.


As someone who impetuously tried to liveblog from the C's last year, I can testify to the time it takes to set up, create hotlinks and so forth as well as blog, and then try to get to the rest of the panels.
I've a friend who has taken a degree in online journalism, and I need to talk with her about how other organizations are doing it. Tweets seem too ephemeral for me--and I wait to see which groups create post- conference blogs, which leave room for the writer to reflect and analyze.

Round two: the first iteration of this post was rejected because I seem to have posted too many at once. My bad.

My bottom line is that, as last year's impetuous blogger from the conference--blogging news as it happened, I found myself blogging too much and attending too little of the conference. I find Tweets to be too ephemeral, but would like to see how other disciplines manage to blog from conferences, which is different , I believe, from blogging after a conference, when one has time to pull together a thoughtful report and reflection.

I never tried to live-blog myself, but I think I managed to do end-of-day posts of sessions I'd attended. I could be remembering myself as having been better about it than I actually was, though.

I really don't mean to blame specific people--it's just felt to me like there wasn't as much outside the twitter feed as there had been in years past.

I do wish, though, that our org would do more to support it. Wifi standards are one way, but video streaming or even podcasting featured sessions would be another. Last time I was in SF for the conf, I posted audio files of my session right afterwards--just hooked up a mike to one of our laptops and ran audacity in the background. It's not rocket science, and it's something for the thousands of members who aren't at the conference.

As I understand it, NCTE owns a portable WiFi system, but the multi-year contract the Cs set up with Hilton forbids them from using it. Let's hope when that contact is re-negotiated, that will change.

I blogged the conference asynchronously, and needed several days after the conference to post the last of my notes. It was particularly tedious since there isn't an HTML version of the program -- it's a pain to have to copy the program information from the PDF.

And thanks for that, Dennis. I really enjoyed reading your session notes.

I don't know what's worse, experiencing bad wifi, or learning that your organization has specifically contracted for bad wifi. ;-)

Support of the Lou Zhu, Lou Zhu worked hard
Nothing is impossible for a willing heart.
[url=][color=black]ugg boots[/color][/url]
Nothing is impossible for a willing heart.
[url=][color=black]ugg bailey button[/color][/url]

Leave a comment



  • images
Powered by Movable Type 4.1

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cgbrooke published on March 14, 2009 10:38 AM.

A brief update was the previous entry in this blog.

Wishing you a happy St. Lunardi's Day is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.