| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (1)

About a month ago, I made mention of the infographic in the NYT about keyword frequencies at both the DNC and RNC. Along the same lines, both Cameron Marlow and Anjo Anjewierden have done similar analyses, this time on the smaller scale of the first Presidential debate.

I don't think that either analysis necessarily presents any surprises, at least for those of us who watched the debates carefully, but that's only because it's easier to grasp a 90-minute debate than it would be were the text(s) more substantial. In other words, relationships and frequencies are easier to gather (intuitively?) in a smaller set of data. What's impressive to me about each of these projects is that they confirm some of my impressions about the debate, and they can tackle much larger-scale texts than I myself would be able to. I hope that both Cameron and Anjo will add the results of the other 2 pres debates and perhaps even the VP one.

And I'll be watching to see how closely those subsequent events follow the patterns that they've laid out for the first...

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Visualizations.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Visualization of keyword frequency from the RNC and DNC speeches, along with a chart that shows mentions and frequencies by various key speakers at each. Found through an earlier post: Presidential Debate - Analysis and it's trackback on Anjo's s... Read More


Learning new stuff, but enjoying your comments a lot. So Cameron Marlow's points are?
Is it ok to communicate this way?

Sure. I'll answer it topside, though. It connected for me with questions of evidence...

Leave a comment



Powered by Movable Type 4.1

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cgbrooke published on October 5, 2004 2:21 PM.

What wouldn't I give to see this? was the previous entry in this blog.

currently reading is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.